What is the difference between weather and climate?
11 min
Level
In this article, we’ll break down what weather and climate mean, explore how they differ, and explain why this distinction is important for understanding our planet.
The voice of impact
ESG / CSR
Industries
Ecology
Greenly solutions
GB
GB
Why the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement is a thorny question
Level
Free trade agreements often promise mutual economic benefits, but they rarely come without challenges. The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement, a proposed trade deal between the European Union and MERCOSUR (a South American trade bloc) aims to create one of the largest free trade zones in the world. However, what should be a milestone in global trade has instead become a flashpoint for intense debate.
The agreement’s ambitious goals of reducing tariffs and boosting trade between the two regions have been overshadowed by widespread concerns about its environmental impact, the risks it poses to local economies, and its implications for human rights. From fears of accelerated deforestation in the Amazon to protests by European farmers, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement is a contentious issue.
👉 In this article, we'll explore why the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement has sparked such controversy, examining its economic, environmental, and social implications.
What is the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement?
The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement represents a trade partnership between the European Union and MERCOSUR (a South American bloc comprising Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay). Negotiations began over two decades ago in 1999, with the two parties reaching a provisional agreement in 2019. If ratified, the deal would encompass 780 million people and facilitate an annual trade flow of up to €45 billion, making it one of the largest trade agreements in the world.
The Objectives of the Agreement
At its core, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement seeks to eliminate nearly all tariffs on goods traded between the two regions. For the EU, this means greater access to MERCOSUR’s markets for its industries, particularly in the automotive, wine, and machinery sectors. Meanwhile, MERCOSUR nations would benefit from expanded exports of agricultural products like beef, soy, and sugar to Europe. The agreement also includes measures to respect regionally recognised products, such as France’s Champagne and Italy’s Parmigiano-Reggiano, protecting them from imitation.
Key Provisions
The deal is not just about lowering trade barriers - it also addresses regulatory cooperation and public procurement. By harmonising standards, it aims to streamline trade while granting European companies access to MERCOSUR’s procurement markets and vice versa. Additionally, quotas have been negotiated for high-demand commodities, such as 99,000 tons of beef and 180,000 tons of poultry, which would be subject to reduced or zero tariffs.
However, these provisions have sparked concerns over fairness and sustainability. EU farmers argue that they face stricter environmental and labor standards than their South American counterparts, leading to fears of unfair competition. Meanwhile, environmentalists warn that incentivising agricultural exports from MERCOSUR could exacerbate deforestation and biodiversity loss.
“ 👉 The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement embodies the promise of economic integration but also highlights the complexities of aligning diverse economic and regulatory priorities. ”
Close
Economic Implications of the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement
The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement promises significant economic benefits for both regions, yet it also raises concerns about uneven gains and potential risks. Some argue that it could unlock substantial trade opportunities, but critics worry about its impact on vulnerable industries and long-term economic stability.
Economic Benefits for the EU
For European industries, the agreement offers improved access to the MERCOSUR market by reducing or eliminating tariffs on key exports. Sectors such as automotive, machinery, and wine stand to gain the most. For example, EU car manufacturers, who currently face tariffs as high as 35%, could benefit from increased competitiveness in MERCOSUR countries. Additionally, the agreement’s focus on removing trade barriers is expected to boost exports of processed goods and high-value items, potentially supporting job growth in these industries.
Economic Benefits for MERCOSUR
On the other side, MERCOSUR countries anticipate increased exports of agricultural goods, including beef, poultry, soy, and sugar. These commodities are essential to their economies and represent an opportunity to access the lucrative EU market under favorable trade terms. The deal could provide a much-needed boost to agricultural revenues, particularly for large-scale producers in Brazil and Argentina.
Concerns and Disparities
Despite these potential gains, the agreement has sparked fears of inequity. European farmers, particularly those in France, argue that the influx of cheaper South American products (often produced under less stringent environmental and labor standards) will undercut their market. EU farmers contend that South American beef producers, who benefit from lower production costs and looser regulations, could dominate the EU market, leaving small-scale farmers at a disadvantage.
Similarly, the deal could exacerbate economic disparities within MERCOSUR. While large agribusinesses stand to gain, smaller farmers and other industries may struggle to compete with European imports of processed goods and machinery. Critics warn that this reliance on agricultural exports could deepen MERCOSUR's economic dependence on raw materials, hindering industrial diversification and long-term growth.
The Trade-Offs of Economic Integration
While the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement aims to foster economic integration, its uneven distribution of benefits and risks highlights the challenges of global trade. Balancing the interests of diverse stakeholders such as farmers, industries, and governments remains a difficult task, particularly in light of environmental and social concerns.
Environmental Controversies Surrounding the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement
While the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement aims to promote economic growth, its potential environmental consequences have become one of the most contentious aspects of the deal. Critics argue that increased trade between the two regions could exacerbate deforestation, carbon emissions, and biodiversity loss, undermining global climate goals and putting ecosystems at risk.
Deforestation and Biodiversity Loss
One of the most alarming concerns is the potential for accelerated deforestation in the Amazon rainforest. By expanding the market for agricultural exports like beef and soy - two of the main drivers of deforestation - the agreement risks incentivising further clearing of land for large-scale farming. A report carried out by the 2020 Ambec Commission suggests that deforestation in MERCOSUR countries - particularly Brazil - could increase by at least 5% annually if the deal is ratified. This destruction would not only devastate biodiversity but also disrupt the livelihoods of Indigenous and rural communities who depend on the forest for survival.
💡 The Amazon plays a critical role as a global carbon sink, absorbing vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Its degradation could push the rainforest toward a tipping point, turning it into an ecosystem that releases more carbon than it stores. Such a shift would have catastrophic implications for climate regulation and biodiversity worldwide.
Climate Impact
The agreement’s emphasis on boosting agricultural exports also raises concerns about greenhouse gas emissions. In Brazil, land-use changes driven by agribusiness account for nearly half of the country’s emissions. The intensification of cattle farming, which generates significant methane emissions, and the clearing of land for soy production would only exacerbate these contributions.
What’s more, the increase in international trade between the two regions will result in higher emissions from transportation. At a time when global efforts to meet the Paris Agreement targets are intensifying, critics argue that the agreement undermines these commitments by prioritising trade over sustainability.
Sustainability Provisions
To address these criticisms, the European Commission has proposed an additional environmental protocol. This annex claims to reinforce sustainability measures and align the agreement with the Paris Climate Agreement. However, environmental groups have dismissed these measures as largely cosmetic, lacking enforceable mechanisms to ensure compliance. There are no binding commitments to curb deforestation or reduce emissions, leaving loopholes for unchecked environmental degradation.
A Broader Debate on Trade and the Environment
The environmental controversies surrounding the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement highlight the broader challenge of reconciling trade liberalisation with sustainability. While economic growth and environmental protection are not inherently incompatible, the trade-offs in this case raise serious questions about whether the deal’s benefits justify its ecological costs. For many critics, the agreement represents a missed opportunity to set a global precedent for sustainable trade practices.
Close
Human Rights Issues Linked to the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement
In addition to the economic and environmental implications, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement also raises serious concerns about its impact on human rights, labor conditions, and public health. Critics argue that by incentivising harmful practices such as land-grabbing, forced labor, and pesticide overuse, the agreement risks deepening social inequalities and threatening vulnerable communities.
Indigenous Rights and Land-Grab Practices
The expansion of agribusiness in MERCOSUR countries, driven by increased demand for beef and soy exports, often comes at the expense of Indigenous and rural communities. Large-scale farming operations frequently encroach on Indigenous lands, displacing communities and eroding their traditional livelihoods. In Brazil alone, more than 950,000 people were affected by rural land conflicts in 2023. This invasion of protected areas not only violates Indigenous rights but also fuels violent clashes between agribusiness interests and local populations.
Land-grabbing - a practice where large corporations or entities acquire land without fair compensation or consent - has become increasingly linked to the agribusiness boom. By enabling greater access to the EU market, the agreement could inadvertently escalate these conflicts, leaving marginalised groups more vulnerable.
Labor Rights Violations
The intensification of agricultural activities under the agreement is also connected to poor labor practices, including forced labor. In Brazil, 2,575 workers were rescued from forced labor conditions in 2022. Many of these cases were linked to agribusiness, particularly in cattle farming and soy production. Critics highlight that the agreement lacks binding clauses to enforce labor rights or penalise violations, leaving workers exposed to exploitation.
Additionally, weak labor protections in MERCOSUR countries contrast sharply with stricter standards in the EU, further fueling concerns about unfair competition and deepening inequalities.
Public Health Risks
The agreement could also exacerbate public health risks on both sides of the Atlantic. Brazil is the world’s largest user of pesticides, many of which are banned in the EU for their harmful effects on human health and biodiversity. In 2022 alone, Brazil approved dozens of new agrochemicals, some classified as highly hazardous. These chemicals frequently contaminate food products exported to European supermarkets, posing risks to consumers.
At the same time, the increased use of pesticides in MERCOSUR countries poses significant health threats to local populations, including higher risks of cancer and other diseases. Farmworkers are particularly vulnerable, often working without adequate safety measures.
Absence of Binding Protections
A recurring criticism of the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement is its lack of enforceable human rights and labor standards. While the agreement includes provisions to promote sustainability and fair practices, these are largely voluntary and offer no mechanisms for accountability.
A Missed Opportunity for Ethical Trade
For critics, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement represents a failure to align trade policy with social and ethical considerations. Without the inclusion of robust protections for vulnerable communities and workers, the deal risks perpetuating inequalities and undermining the EU’s commitment to upholding human rights in its external policies.
Close
Political and Public Opposition to the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement
The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement has not only sparked economic and environmental concerns but also ignited fierce political and public opposition across Europe and South America. Governments, civil society organisations, and individuals on both continents have expressed dissatisfaction, often for vastly different reasons, making the agreement’s path to ratification contentious.
Political Divisions Within the EU
In Europe, the agreement has exposed sharp divisions among EU member states. France has been one of its most vocal critics, with President Emmanuel Macron citing concerns over the environmental impact and unfair competition faced by French farmers. Similarly, Austria, Ireland, and the Netherlands have expressed skepticism, particularly over the deforestation risks and the lack of enforceable environmental protections.
France’s opposition is bolstered by strong farmer protests, as unions argue that the influx of South American agricultural products - produced under less stringent regulations - will harm European farming industries. Prime Minister Michel Barnier has called for “mirror clauses”, which would require imported products to meet the same environmental and health standards as those in the EU. However, the European Commission has shown little willingness to incorporate such demands into the agreement.
On the other hand, countries like Germany and Spain, whose industries stand to benefit from increased exports of machinery and automotive products, have pushed for the deal’s ratification. These nations argue that the agreement will stimulate economic growth and provide Europe with better access to crucial raw materials like lithium and copper, essential for the green energy transition.
Public Protests and NGO Campaigns
Beyond governmental opposition, the agreement has faced significant pushback from civil society. Environmental groups, including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, have launched campaigns against the deal, emphasising its potential to exacerbate deforestation, emissions, and human rights abuses. In Brazil, activists have highlighted the risks to Indigenous communities and the continued encroachment of agribusiness on protected lands.
Protests by European farmers, particularly in France, have further fueled public resistance. Farmers argue that the agreement prioritises trade liberalisation over local livelihoods, flooding the market with cheaper imports produced under less stringent conditions. Nationwide demonstrations have called attention to the perceived imbalance between economic gains for industries and losses for the agricultural sector.
Lack of Transparency
Another contentious issue is the lack of transparency during the negotiation process. Critics have accused the European Commission of conducting the talks in secrecy, with limited consultation of stakeholders such as local communities, trade unions, and environmental experts. Portions of the agreement’s text remain unpublished or inaccessible, particularly for MERCOSUR countries.
In response to opposition from member states, the European Commission has proposed splitting the agreement into two parts: a trade component and a broader cooperation component. The trade part would require only a qualified majority vote in the EU Council, effectively bypassing the need for unanimous approval from all member states and their national parliaments. This strategy has been criticised as an attempt to sidestep democratic processes and limit the influence of dissenting voices, particularly from countries like France and Austria.
A Polarising Deal
The political and public opposition to the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement reflects its deeply polarising nature. Supporters see it as a vital step toward economic integration and growth, while critics view it as a threat to environmental standards, local industries, and democratic values. As the debate continues, these divisions underscore the challenges of crafting trade agreements that balance diverse economic, social, and political priorities. Without meaningful compromise, the agreement’s path to ratification remains uncertain.
Close
The Future of the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement
After more than two decades of negotiations, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement remains stalled, caught in a web of political, environmental, and economic concerns. While some leaders hope to finalise the deal soon, significant obstacles stand in the way, raising questions about whether it can be ratified in its current form.
Ratification Challenges
The agreement’s ratification process is particularly complex, requiring approval not only from the European Parliament but also from all 27 EU member states. Some member states, including France and Austria, have signaled their intent to block the agreement unless significant changes are made. France, in particular, has called for the inclusion of “mirror clauses” to ensure imported products meet EU environmental and health standards, a demand the European Commission has yet to fully address.
Complicating matters further, the European Commission has considered splitting the agreement into two parts: a trade component and a cooperation component. By isolating the trade provisions, the deal could be approved with a qualified majority vote in the EU Council, bypassing the need for unanimous support. However, this approach has faced criticism for undermining democratic processes and further alienating dissenting member states.
On the MERCOSUR side, domestic challenges have also slowed progress. Brazil, the bloc’s largest economy, faces internal divisions over the agreement, particularly regarding its impact on small farmers and Indigenous communities. In addition, environmental concerns have created tensions between MERCOSUR governments and international stakeholders, with critics accusing the bloc of failing to enforce meaningful sustainability measures.
Ongoing Negotiations and Proposed Revisions
In an attempt to break the deadlock, the European Commission and MERCOSUR have reopened negotiations to address key criticisms. A proposed environmental protocol aims to align the agreement with the Paris Climate Agreement, though many critics argue that the measures remain too weak and unenforceable. France and other opposing countries have also pushed for stricter labor and human rights protections, as well as guarantees to prevent deforestation.
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has expressed support for the deal, emphasizing its potential to boost trade and strengthen international cooperation. However, he has also acknowledged the need for environmental safeguards to address growing international pressure.
Future Scenarios
The future of the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement depends largely on whether meaningful compromises can be reached. If the European Commission manages to incorporate stricter environmental and social protections, it could ease resistance from key EU member states. However, failure to address these concerns could lead to prolonged delays or even the agreement’s collapse.
Alternatively, the agreement may pass in a fragmented form. By isolating the trade component and seeking approval through a qualified majority vote, the European Commission could bypass some of the opposition. However, this approach risks deepening divisions within the EU and undermining public trust in the bloc’s commitment to sustainability and democratic values.
An Uncertain Path Forward
As it stands, the EU-MERCOSUR Agreement remains a symbol of the challenges inherent in modern trade deals: balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability, social equity, and political consensus. Whether the deal will be ratified, revised, or abandoned altogether, its future will likely depend on the ability of both blocs to address these competing priorities and craft a more inclusive and sustainable vision for international trade.
Close
What About Greenly?
The EU-MERCOSUR Agreement underscores the importance of sustainability in global trade. At Greenly, we help businesses navigate environmental challenges, helping them to align their operations with global climate goals. Whether it’s reducing emissions, improving supply chain sustainability, or meeting international standards, Greenly’s carbon management solutions provide the tools you need to succeed.
Comprehensive Carbon Tracking
Greenly’s platform enables businesses to monitor their Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, offering detailed insights into the activities and processes contributing most to their carbon footprint. This data-driven approach helps companies identify opportunities for targeted reductions.
Lifecycle Assessment Services
We conduct Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) to evaluate the environmental impact of products and services throughout their lifecycle. By understanding the emissions associated with each stage of production, businesses can make informed decisions to improve sustainability.
Supply Chain Sustainability
Greenly supports companies in optimising their supply chains by identifying high-emission activities and recommending more sustainable suppliers. Our tailored solutions ensure that businesses meet both regulatory requirements and consumer expectations.
Decarbonisation Pathways
With our expertise, companies can develop realistic decarbonisation plans to meet science-based targets. From action plans to cost simulations, we provide the tools necessary for meaningful emissions reductions.
👉 By leveraging Greenly’s suite of carbon management services, businesses can navigate the complexities of trade and sustainability while demonstrating their commitment to a greener future. Get in touch with us today.
More articles
View all
The environmental challenges surrounding fertilisers
9 min
Level
In this article, we’ll explore the environmental challenges of fertilisers and what’s being done to address them.
What is the Problem with Kerosene?
9 min
Level
n this article, we’ll explain what kerosene is, why it’s bad for the planet, and what we could use instead of kerosene.
What is the Carbon Footprint of Celebrities?
9 min
Level
In light of their colossal levels of emissions, Greenly investigates all you need to know about the celebrities with the alleged biggest carbon footprint.
Share
Subscribe to the newsletter