
Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities (IRO) for CSRD Reporting
In this article, we’ll break down what IROs are, how to identify and assess them, and what CSRD requires in terms of disclosure.
ESG / CSR
Industries


By Kara Anderson, UK Copywriter, on 09/10/2024
Updated by Kara Anderson, on 29/05/2026


The EU Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR) fundamentally changes how companies source raw materials for the European market. To combat global forest loss, the EU now requires businesses to legally verify that their core commodities do not originate from recently deforested land or contribute to forest degradation.
For companies handling palm oil, soy, cocoa, coffee, cattle, rubber, or wood, compliance is now a core operational requirement.
Following extensive negotiations and adjustments to ensure market readiness, the final deadlines are now locked in. Large and medium-sized enterprises must fully comply by December 30, 2026, while micro and small enterprises (SMEs) have until June 30, 2027, to meet the requirements.
With enforcement deadlines landing at the end of this year, the time to prepare is shrinking. The technical demands of the regulation - particularly tracing products back to their exact plot of land - mean procurement and compliance teams are already restructuring their data collection to avoid supply chain disruptions.
The EUDR is the European Union’s strategy to eliminate deforestation from its commercial footprint. It addresses a major global issue: EU consumption accounts for roughly 10% of global deforestation driven by commercial agriculture.
The regulation introduces a strict market ban. You cannot sell or export specific high-risk commodities within the EU market unless you can verify they did not originate from land deforested or degraded after December 31, 2020.
Previous laws, like the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR), only targeted illegal logging. The EUDR goes much further. Even if a supplier legally clears a forest under their local country’s laws to plant coffee or soy, that product is barred from the EU if the land was cleared after the 2020 cut-off date.
Unlike older regulations that focused strictly on wood and timber, the EUDR targets agricultural sectors that traditionally operate with complex, multi-tiered global supply chains.
The regulation serves as a core pillar of the European Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, aiming to drastically cut global carbon emissions and halt habitat loss in critical agricultural hubs.
The policy focuses on three main commercial and environmental metrics:
The EUDR does not apply universally to all agricultural goods. Instead, it targets seven specific raw commodities identified as the primary drivers of global deforestation, alongside their derived products.
If your business imports, processes, or exports any of the following items, they must be verified as deforestation-free:
Raw oil, extracts, and derivatives commonly used in cosmetics, food processing, and cleaning products.
Raw beans, meal, and oil primarily utilised in animal feed and processed foods.
Timber, pulp, paper, and downstream finished goods like furniture and packaging material.
Beans, paste, butter, and chocolate products.
Raw, roasted, or ground coffee products.
Raw rubber, sheets, and derived components such as commercial tires and footwear.
Live animals, beef products, and derived leather goods.
Beyond raw materials, the regulation covers complex downstream products. For example, importing bulk chocolate or a shipment of leather car seats triggers the exact same compliance and tracing obligations as importing raw cocoa beans or cattle hides.
To understand why these specific goods were chosen, the European Commission analysed which imports historically contributed most to deforestation. The table below outlines that breakdown.
| Product | Share of EU Deforestation Import Footprint | Primary sourcing hotspots | Common derived commercial products |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Oil | 34.0% | Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia) | Processed foods, cosmetics, biodiesel, surfactants |
| Soy | 32.8% | South America (Brazil, Argentina) | Commercial animal feed, vegetable oils, food additives |
| Wood | 8.6% | Global (Tropical, Temperate & Boreal zones) | Timber, paper packaging, wood pulp, furniture |
| Cocoa | 7.5% | West Africa (Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana) | Chocolate, confectionery ingredients, cosmetics |
| Coffee | 7.0% | Central & South America, East Africa | Roasted, ground, and instant commercial coffee |
| Cattle (Beef & Leather) | Major Driver | South America (Amazon & Cerrado biomes) | Commercial beef, raw hides, finished leather goods |
| Rubber | 3.4% | Southeast Asia (Thailand, Vietnam) | Industrial tires, footwear, latex manufacturing |
The EUDR applies to any commercial entity importing, processing, or exporting the regulated commodities within the EU market. However, a major legislative update restructured how responsibilities are distributed down the supply chain, moving away from a one-size-fits-all model to prevent double-reporting.
An operator is the company that first places a regulated commodity on the EU market, or exports it from the EU.
A distinct category was established for smallholders and small businesses operating in low-risk countries who obtain or grow the materials themselves.
If you handle a product after it has already been legally placed on the EU market by a primary operator (eg. you are a processor, manufacturer, or distributor buying raw materials within the EU), you are classified as a downstream operator.
Company size no longer dictates whether you comply, but it does dictate when your reporting systems must be fully operational:
Full compliance deadline for all Large and Medium-sized enterprises, alongside downstream operators and traders of all sizes.
Extended deadline for Micro and Small enterprises (SMEs), giving smaller business owners additional time to integrate their data tracking.
The regulation applies globally. Non-EU suppliers are not exempt; if they export to Europe, they must feed the required geolocation and legality data directly to their EU-based partners to keep the trade lane open.
At its core, the EUDR operates on a reversed burden of proof. The regulator does not have to prove your products caused deforestation; you must prove they didn't before they can enter or leave the EU market.
To achieve this, companies must implement a structured, three-step due diligence process. If you miss a single step, the entire shipment is locked out of the market.
If materials are sourced exclusively from an officially designated Low-Risk Country, businesses must still complete Step 1 and file a baseline statement, but are exempt from completing formal risk assessments (Step 2) and risk mitigation measures (Step 3).
Once the three steps are complete and risk is verified as negligible, the operator must upload the data into EU Traces, the central digital registry. The system generates a unique reference number for that specific batch.
Without this reference number, a shipment cannot clear EU customs, and downstream buyers cannot legally purchase your product.
The EUDR relies on strict enforcement to ensure the market takes its requirements seriously. Oversight falls on the competent authorities within individual EU member states, who are tasked with auditing compliance, verifying data, and penalising non-compliant commercial entities.
For commercial teams, a compliance failure carries heavy financial risk, with penalties scaling based on the severity of the violation.
Failing to file a valid Due Diligence Statement or submitting falsified geolocation data triggers a baseline set of penalties across all member states:
Competent authorities can issue fines of up to 4% of a company’s total annual EU turnover. For multinational enterprises, this transforms a compliance error into a material financial threat.
Authorities have the power to seize both the non-compliant physical goods and any revenue generated from the transaction.
Serious or repeated violations can result in a temporary ban (up to 12 months) from participating in public procurement processes or accessing public funding within the EU.
Beyond formal legal penalties, the most immediate operational bottleneck is customs clearance delays. If a shipment lacks a verified digital reference number, it will be locked out at the border, disrupting downstream manufacturing timelines.
Enforcement is not random. National authorities allocate their inspection resources using a risk-based matrix tied directly to the EU’s country benchmarking system.
The law mandates strict minimum inspection rates for operators sourcing from different regions:
National authorities must check at least 9% of operators sourcing from these regions annually. Shipments from high-risk zones face intensive, proactive documentation audits and satellite verification checks.
A minimum inspection rate of 3% of operators applies to these supply chains.
Sourcing from low-risk zones drops the mandatory inspection rate to just 1% of operators.
The enforcement mechanism also includes a framework for third-party scrutiny. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs), industry competitors, and private individuals can submit formal, substantiated concerns to national authorities if they suspect a company is bypassing the regulations.
Authorities are legally required to investigate these external submissions, meaning companies face reputational exposure if their public environmental claims do not match their underlying supply chain data.
The EU Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR) is expected to have a significant impact on global trade, especially in countries that are major producers of commodities linked to deforestation. Countries such as Brazil, Indonesia, and Malaysia, which are key exporters of palm oil, soy, and beef, are likely to feel the effects the most.
Because the compliance burden drops significantly when sourcing from officially designated 'Low-Risk Countries', purchasing teams are factoring regional risk tiers directly into their long-term supply strategies. This is driving localised shifts toward regions with robust digital land registries and stable forest cover, such as North America and Europe.
Implementing polygon geolocation tracking, establishing verification data loops, and conducting third-party risk assessments represent a clear operational expense. To address concerns about supply chain friction, the European Commission introduced a Simplification Package in May 2026.
The scope of the EUDR is not entirely static. As the implementation deadlines approach, the European Commission has introduced specific updates to fine-tune exactly which products require tracking, balancing operational feasibility against environmental goals.
As part of recent regulatory updates, the Commission introduced a draft delegated act proposing to exclude leather, hides, and skins from the regulation's active compliance scope.
The idea was to align raw material rules with finished downstream products - such as footwear or automotive upholstery - which were already omitted from the framework due to the extreme difficulty of tracing processed leather back to a specific plot of land.
While this proposal has seen pushback from environmental policy groups during public consultations, it represents a significant shift for the car sector and fashion supply chains.
On the other hand, the EU has moved to close other loopholes, integrating specific processed items like soluble coffee blends into the text to ensure a level playing field across entire product categories.
The structural framework for the EU’s country benchmarking system has also seen pushback from international trade partners seeking exemptions.
While there was significant external diplomatic pressure - particularly from the U.S. - to introduce an entirely exempt "No-Risk" category that would bypass reporting altogether, the EU has maintained its strict three-tier matrix (Low, Standard, High).
This means that regardless of a country's classification, the core requirement remains unchanged: all importing operators must still collect and provide basic traceability data, ensuring a universal minimum standard across the market.
While the nuances of product scopes and administrative adjustments continue to be refined, the legal timeline for business operations is locked in. The European Commission plans to conduct its next comprehensive structural review by June 2030, where it will evaluate expanding definitions to other vulnerable ecosystems, such as savannahs and wetlands.
For procurement and compliance professionals, the immediate priority is data readiness. With full enforcement applying to Large and Medium enterprises on December 30, 2026, followed by Micro and Small businesses on June 30, 2027, companies have a clear window to verify their supplier data pipelines, map coordinates, and ensure compliant entry into the EU market.
Products containing relevant commodities that were produced before the compliance deadlines (December 30, 2026, for large/medium enterprises) are still subject to the EUDR if they are placed on the EU market or exported after that date. The critical date to watch is the December 31, 2020 cut-off; regardless of when the final product was manufactured, you must prove the raw materials did not come from land deforested after 2020.
Under the EUDR, forest degradation specifically refers to structural changes that turn primary forests or naturally regenerating forests into plantation forests or other wooded land. If your timber or wood supply chain involves harvesting operations that fundamentally alter the ecosystem from a diverse, natural forest to a monoculture plantation, it is classified as degraded and is non-compliant.
It depends entirely on the material type. 100% post-consumer recycled materials (such as recycled paper or reclaimed timber furniture) are exempt from the EUDR compliance scope, as they are not considered primary drivers of new deforestation. However, if your product uses a mix of virgin and recycled fibers, the virgin component must be fully traced back to its plot of origin with complete geolocation data.
Third-party certifications like the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) are valuable tools for Step 2 (Risk Assessment) and Step 3 (Risk Mitigation). However, they cannot be used as a substitute for a formal Due Diligence Statement. The EUDR requires mandatory GPS/polygon geolocation data and local legality verification; you cannot rely solely on a third-party certificate to clear EU customs.
For plots of land larger than 4 hectares, the EUDR requires a polygon - a series of geographic coordinates that map the exact boundary line of the property. For smaller plots under 4 hectares, a single point latitude and longitude coordinate is acceptable. This data must be formatted correctly to upload into the EU Traces system.
If a shipment enters an EU port strictly under a customs transit procedure to be moved to a non-EU country (eg. a shipment of coffee from Brazil stopping in Rotterdam en route to the UK), it is not considered placed on the EU market and does not require an EUDR Due Diligence Statement. However, if the goods are cleared for free circulation, processed, or repackaged within the EU, full compliance is triggered.
