Tourism & the Environment: A Delicate Balance
12 min
Level
In this article, we explore the tension between the benefits of tourism and its environmental impact.
The voice of impact
ESG / CSR
Industries
Greenly solutions
US
US
Smartphone vs Tablet: Which One is Greener?
Level
As we increasingly come to rely on electronic devices in our daily lives, it's important to consider their environmental impact. This article compares the environmental impact of smartphones and tablets, focusing on their ecological footprints from production to disposal. It aims to determine which of these everyday devices is ‘greener’, offering insights into the sustainability of our digital choices.
In this article we explore the environmental impact of smartphones and tablets and consider which is the greener device.
The lifecycle of a device
“ We live in a world that’s increasingly reliant on technology; electronic devices impact almost every aspect of our lives - from the smartphones, we use to keep in touch with friends and family, to the laptops we work on, to the tablets from which we stream the latest series. And while most consumers are more aware of their environmental impact than ever before, we often overlook the impact of our electronic devices. ”
The environmental footprint of our gadgets is a growing concern and consumer electronics such as smartphones and tablets are significant contributors to environmental issues. The production, usage, and disposal of these devices have far-reaching implications for our planet.
This article provides a critical comparison of two of the most commonplace electronic gadgets: the environmental impact of smartphones versus tablets.
We will explore several key factors that play pivotal roles in determining how 'green' these devices are. First, we will examine their manufacturing processes, which involve the extraction and use of various materials (some of which are rare and difficult to mine).
Next, we will consider their energy consumption. From their battery life to the energy needed for daily operations, understanding their power usage is crucial in assessing their environmental impact. Additionally, the lifespan of these devices, influenced by factors such as durability and software updates, affects how frequently they need to be replaced, thereby impacting their environmental footprint.
Finally, we will look at their end-of-life stage (ie. disposal and recycling) to understand how these practices contribute to or mitigate environmental harm. Through this analysis, we will try to determine which device - a smartphone or a tablet - is the greener gadget in our increasingly digital world.
Discover how conducting a life cycle analysis can help your company assess its environmental impact in our article.
Manufacturing and materials
“ The environmental impact of smartphones and tablets begins at the manufacturing stage. Both devices rely on a variety of materials, some of which are common, while others are rare and more environmentally costly to extract. Key among these are rare earth metals, used in everything from the screen display to the battery. ”
These rare earth elements can be challenging and often environmentally damaging to extract due to the required intensive mining processes. Additionally, both smartphones and tablets use various plastics and metals in their casings and internal components, contributing further to their environmental impact.
What’s more, is that the carbon footprint of manufacturing these devices is significant. It’s not just the materials themselves, but also the energy-intensive processes required to turn these raw materials into the required components. For example, over 80% of a smartphone's carbon footprint stems from the manufacturing stage. The average smartphone is estimated to generate around 55 kilograms of CO2 equivalent, and for tablets, this number can be even higher due to their larger size and more extensive use of materials.
However, it’s not all bad news. In recent years, major manufacturers have started taking significant steps towards sustainability. Efforts are being made to reduce the carbon footprint and environmental impact of production processes. For example, some companies are committing to using recycled materials wherever possible, reducing the need for new raw materials and lessening the impact of mining. Others are investing in renewable energy sources for their manufacturing plants, aiming to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions.
Overview
Smartphone:
- Materials used: Smartphones are made up of a variety of materials including rare earth elements, metals, and plastics. The extraction and processing of these materials, especially rare earth elements, often involve environmentally damaging methods.
- Carbon footprint: The manufacturing process of smartphones is energy-intensive, contributing significantly to their carbon footprint. The miniaturization of components requires precise, energy-intensive manufacturing processes.
Tablet:
- Materials used: Tablets, like smartphones, rely on rare earth elements, metals, and plastics. However, due to their larger size, the quantity of materials used is generally higher, which can lead to a greater environmental impact per unit.
- Carbon footprint: The larger size and more complex components of tablets often result in a higher carbon footprint during manufacturing compared to smartphones. This is due to the increased use of materials and the energy required for their production.
Verdict:
“ When comparing smartphones and tablets, the key difference lies in the scale of material use and the resultant carbon footprint. While both device types have similar manufacturing processes and material types, tablets tend to have a larger environmental impact due to their size. ”
However, on a more positive note, both smartphone and tablet manufacturers are showing a growing commitment to reducing environmental impact. This is evidenced by the adoption of more sustainable materials, efforts to reduce energy consumption during production, and initiatives aimed at extending the lifespan of devices.
To learn more about the carbon impact of an iPhone why not check out our article on the topic.
Close
Energy consumption
“ Energy consumption is an important aspect in determining the environmental impact of electronic devices. In the case of smartphones and tablets, several factors contribute to their overall energy efficiency, including battery life, charging habits, and design advancements. These devices not only consume energy during use but also throughout the entire lifecycle, from charging to the energy required for wireless data transfer and operation of the different applications. ”
The energy efficiency of a device is largely influenced by its hardware and software optimization. Displays, one of the most power-intensive components, have seen significant improvements with technologies like OLED and AMOLED, which are generally more energy-efficient than traditional LCD screens. Additionally, advancements in processor technology have led to more power-efficient chipsets that perform tasks quicker and consume less power.
Battery technology also plays a role in a device's energy consumption. The capacity and efficiency of batteries determine how frequently a device needs to be charged. Lithium-ion batteries, commonly used in these devices, have improved in terms of energy density, allowing for longer use between charges. However, the environmental impact of battery production and disposal remains a concern.
User habits such as charging frequency also contribute to energy consumption. Fast charging, while convenient, often leads to higher energy use and can degrade battery health over time, leading to more frequent charging cycles or battery replacements. Wireless charging also typically uses more energy than traditional cable charging due to lower efficiency.
In recent years, there has been a significant push towards incorporating eco-friendly power sources and designing energy-efficient devices. Solar charging capabilities, power-saving modes, and software optimizations that prolong battery life are becoming more common. Manufacturers are also focusing on reducing the standby power consumption of these devices, which can contribute significantly to their overall energy use.
Overview
Smartphone:
- Energy efficiency: Generally consumes less energy due to smaller size and hardware.
- Battery life and charging: Varied battery life; frequent charging with fast chargers increases energy use.
Tablet:
- Energy efficiency: Higher energy consumption but more efficient designs in some models balance it out.
- Battery life and charging: Longer battery life but larger batteries consume more energy per charge.
Verdict:
While smartphones are typically more energy-efficient due to their smaller size, the gap with tablets is closing thanks to advancements in energy-efficient design and eco-friendly technologies. Both types of devices are evolving with a focus on reducing environmental impact through improved battery technology and smarter energy usage.
Lifespan and usage
The environmental impact of smartphones and tablets extends beyond manufacturing and energy consumption; it also encompasses their lifespan and usage patterns. The duration for which these devices are used, and how they are used, plays a critical role in determining their overall environmental footprint.
Lifespan Factors
“ The lifespan of electronic devices is determined by a mix of hardware durability, software support, and consumer usage patterns. ”
Smartphones and tablets are often replaced not because they stop functioning, but due to their perceived obsolescence driven by market trends and software incompatibilities. The frequent release of new models encourages a culture of regular upgrades. However, the environmental cost of this upgrade cycle is significant, with each new device requiring resources for production and eventually adding to electronic waste.
Build quality is a key determinant of a device's lifespan. Higher-quality materials and robust construction can extend the life of smartphones and tablets, reducing the frequency of replacements. However, issues like non-replaceable batteries and the difficulty in repairing modern devices can shorten their usable life.
Software updates also play a role. On one hand, regular updates can prolong a device's lifespan by keeping it compatible with new applications and security standards. On the other hand, some updates may not be optimized for older models, leading to decreased performance and, consequently, a shorter lifespan.
Usage Patterns
Usage patterns are another factor that significantly influences the longevity of these devices. Intensive use and lack of maintenance can accelerate wear and tear, while careful use and regular maintenance can extend a device’s life.
Overview
Smartphone:
- Lifespan: Typically shorter due to frequent upgrades and trends. The average lifespan of a smartphone in the US is around 2.5 years.
- Usage patterns: Often used more intensively, leading to quicker wear and tear.
Tablet:
- Lifespan: Generally longer, as tablets are upgraded less frequently. The average lifespan of a tablet device in the US is 6 years - more than double the lifespan of a smartphone.
- Usage patterns: Less intensive use compared to smartphones, contributing to a longer lifespan.
Verdict:
When comparing the environmental impact of smartphones and tablets in terms of lifespan and usage patterns, tablets generally emerge as the greener option. This is mostly due to their longer lifespans, driven by less frequent upgrades and typically less intensive usage. Smartphones, while offering impressive technological advancements, often fall victim to a faster upgrade cycle and more intensive daily use, leading to a shorter lifespan and a greater cumulative environmental impact.
“ To achieve greater sustainability both industries should focus on extending the usable life of these devices and the need for frequent replacements. The smartphone industry in particular can make significant advances in terms of sustainability by addressing the factors that currently lead to their shorter usage life. Ultimately, the greener choice depends not only on the design and durability of the devices but also on consumer usage habits. ”
Disposal and recycling
The end-of-life management of smartphones and tablets can’t be ignored when it comes to assessing their environmental impact. Disposal and recycling practices play a role in determining how eco-friendly these devices truly are.
Disposal challenges
“ Electronic waste (also referred to as e-waste) is one of the fastest-growing waste streams in the world, and improperly disposed of smartphones and tablets contribute to this issue. ”
These devices contain hazardous materials like lead, mercury, and cadmium, which can leak into the environment if not disposed of correctly. Additionally, the presence of valuable materials like gold and copper makes e-waste a target for unofficial recycling processes, which often lack environmental and health safety measures.
The complexity of these devices also presents a challenge for recycling. Modern smartphones and tablets are not designed with disassembly and recycling in mind, making the process labor-intensive and costly. This complexity often leads to a lower recycling rate, as many components are bound together, and extracting valuable materials becomes too difficult.
Recycling Advancements
Despite these challenges, we have seen advancements in the recycling of smartphones and tablets. Many manufacturers and independent organizations operate take-back programs, encouraging consumers to return their old devices for proper recycling. These programs aim to recover valuable materials and ensure hazardous components are handled responsibly.
Technological advancements in recycling processes have also improved the efficiency of material recovery. Innovations like automated disassembly lines and more sophisticated sorting technologies are helping to extract a higher percentage of valuable materials from e-waste.
Overview
Smartphone:
- Disposal and recycling: Smartphones, due to their smaller size and higher replacement rate, contribute significantly to e-waste. However, they are also more likely to be recycled through take-back programs and trade-in offers.
- Recycling challenges: The compact and integrated design of smartphones makes disassembly and material recovery challenging.
Tablet:
- Disposal and recycling: Tablets, being larger and less frequently replaced, contribute to e-waste differently. They often end up in landfills due to less awareness about recycling options.
- Recycling challenges: The larger batteries and screens in tablets present specific challenges in recycling, requiring specialized processes for safe and efficient material recovery.
Verdict:
Both smartphones and tablets present unique challenges in disposal and recycling. Smartphones, with their higher turnover rate, contribute more frequently to e-waste but are also more actively recycled. Tablets, though less frequently discarded, are more likely to end up in landfills.
“ The key to improving the environmental footprint of these devices lies in enhancing design for disassembly, promoting consumer awareness about recycling options, and advancing recycling technologies. ”
As it stands, smartphones may have a slight edge in terms of recycling efficiency and initiatives, but there's significant room for improvement in the recycling processes for both types of devices.
Discover the carbon footprint of a recycled smartphone in our blog.
Which is the greener option? Smartphone vs Tablet
After looking at the lifecycle of both smartphones and tablets, from their manufacturing and materials to their energy consumption, lifespan, and disposal/recycling practices, a clearer picture emerges of which device is generally greener.
Manufacturing and Materials
The manufacturing process of both smartphones and tablets has a significant environmental impact, primarily due to the use of rare earth elements and the energy-intensive production processes. However, tablets tend to have a larger environmental impact in this area due to their bigger size and greater material usage.
Energy Consumption
Smartphones typically consume less energy than tablets owing to their smaller size and less power-demanding components. Although tablets are improving in energy efficiency, smartphones still hold a slight edge in this area.
Lifespan and Usage Patterns
Tablets generally boast a longer lifespan compared to smartphones. This is mainly due to less frequent upgrades and a less intensive usage pattern, making tablets more environmentally friendly in terms of overall resource utilization over time.
Disposal and Recycling
When it comes to disposal and recycling, smartphones tend to be recycled more efficiently, partly due to better-established recycling programs and a higher turnover rate. However, the process remains challenging for both device types, with significant room for improvement.
Which is Greener?
“ Overall, considering the combined factors of manufacturing impact, energy consumption, lifespan, and end-of-life disposal, tablets take the lead as the greener option. ”
Their longer lifespan is what tips the balance, as it means less frequent manufacturing of new units and therefore a lower overall environmental impact.
However, while tablets may currently be the greener option, continuous improvements in smartphone technology and sustainability practices could narrow or even close this gap. The key to a more environmentally friendly future lies in sustainable manufacturing, energy-efficient design, longer device lifespans, and improved recycling processes for both smartphones and tablets.
What about Greenly?
At Greenly we can help you to assess your company’s carbon footprint, and then give you the tools you need to cut down on emissions. Why not request a free demo with one of our experts - no obligation or commitment required.
If reading this article has inspired you to consider your company’s own carbon footprint, Greenly can help. Learn more about Greenly’s carbon management platform here.
More Articles
View all
What is the SEC and How is it Related to the Environment?
9 min
Level
How does the SEC, otherwise known as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, help the United States regulate environmental policies?
Share
Subscribe to the newsletter