AEnwgbNJEFaPX4b1 GRAEnwi7NJEFaPX4b4 LEAF
Greenlyhttps://images.prismic.io/greenly/43d30a11-8d8a-4079-b197-b988548fad45_Logo+Greenly+x3.pngGreenly, la plateforme tout-en-un dédiée à toutes les entreprises désireuses de mesurer, piloter et réduire leurs émissions de CO2.
GreenlyGreenly, la plateforme tout-en-un dédiée à toutes les entreprises désireuses de mesurer, piloter et réduire leurs émissions de CO2.
Descending4
Home
1
Blog
2
Category
3
Carbon Offset Demystified: Your Complete Guide
4
Media > All articles > Offset > Carbon Offset Demystified: Your Complete Guide

Carbon Offset Demystified: Your Complete Guide

ESG / CSROffset
Level
Hero Image
Hero Image
someone holding a plant
What is a carbon offset? How do they differ from carbon credits? And why should your company consider investing in a carbon offsetting project?
ESG / CSR
2025-12-09T00:00:00.000Z
en-gb

Reducing emissions remains the priority for any credible sustainability strategy, but many companies still turn to carbon offsets to address the impact they can’t fully eliminate. This guide explains what carbon offsets are, how they work in practice, and the role they can play alongside wider emissions reduction efforts, including the limitations to keep in mind.

In this article…

  • We break down what carbon offsets are (and what they aren’t)

  • How they differ from carbon credits

  • When they can support a wider emissions reduction strategy

  • The key limitations to keep in mind

What is a carbon offset?

note icon

A carbon offset is simply a way to balance out emissions that you can’t avoid. Instead of being a licence to keep polluting, it’s a financial contribution to projects that actively reduce or remove greenhouse gases - like reforestation, renewable energy, or community energy-efficiency programmes.

Many of these projects take place in lower-income regions, where they can deliver more than just carbon benefits. Alongside emissions reductions, they often support local livelihoods, protect ecosystems, and improve access to cleaner energy or technology.

You’ve likely heard the terms carbon offset project and carbon offset credits used as if they mean the same thing, but they don’t. Read on to find out how to tell them apart.

Close
youtube screenshot

What's the difference between a carbon credit and a carbon offset?

🎫 Carbon credits
🌍 Represent a verified amount of carbon removed or avoided
🔁 Used to balance emissions already produced (post-activity)
📜 Issued only after a project proves its climate impact
🧮 Each credit = 1 tonne of CO₂e avoided or removed
🪙 Tradeable on regulated or voluntary carbon markets
♻️ Carbon offsets
💸 Funding for climate projects (e.g., reforestation, clean energy)
🛠 Used to balance residual emissions after reduction efforts
⏳ Often purchased in anticipation of future environmental impact (pre-activity)
🌱 Can deliver co-benefits like biodiversity or community support
⚠️ Not a substitute for cutting emissions at the source

To put this into perspective, imagine a consulting firm that often flies overseas to meet clients. Before booking those trips, the obvious first question is whether they’re genuinely necessary - could the same outcome be achieved over video instead? Cutting travel where it isn’t essential immediately reduces emissions and keeps day-to-day practice in line with sustainability goals.

When travel really is unavoidable, that’s where carbon offsets come in. Each time a consultant needs to fly, the company could support projects like reforestation or renewable energy to balance out the emissions from that flight.

note icon

Offsetting doesn’t replace the work of reducing emissions at the source, but it can help account for the impact of those trips that can’t realistically be cut.

How does carbon offsetting work?

Once a company has done everything it reasonably can to cut its own emissions, offsetting comes into play for what’s left. Instead of managing projects directly, most organisations work with a certified offset provider who connects them to credible climate initiatives. Whether that’s restoring damaged ecosystems, improving energy access, or funding methane capture.

The process is straightforward:

  • 1. Calculate your carbon footprint

  • 2. Choose verified projects that match your remaining impact

  • 3. Contribute funding proportionate to those emissions

Rather than being a theoretical gesture, that money translates into real activity on the ground: tree cover restored, clean cookstoves distributed, landfill methane captured, solar infrastructure installed, and so on.

note icon

Offsets don’t replace the need to keep reducing emissions, but they can support climate action beyond a company’s own boundaries.

Close
youtube screenshot

What types of carbon offset projects are there?

Carbon offset projects don’t follow a one-size-fits-all model. Many offset standards and issuers organise them into two broad buckets: “avoidance/reduction” (projects that prevent emissions from happening) and “removal/sequestration” (projects that take CO₂ out of the atmosphere).

Inside those buckets, there are dozens, sometimes hundreds, of different project types. Some databases catalogue over 200 distinct kinds of activities that qualify for carbon credits or offsets!

To keep things simple, we'll focus on the most common and widely used categories. But it’s worth remembering: the carbon-offset landscape is diverse and constantly evolving - what you pick can meaningfully affect both climate effectiveness and social impact.

🌲 Forest & land-use
What it is
Projects that protect or restore carbon-rich ecosystems — forests, wetlands, mangroves, peatlands — and enhance natural carbon storage.
Advantages
Supports biodiversity and ecosystem restoration
Often delivers co-benefits (soil health, flood protection, livelihoods)
Can offer long-term carbon storage
Limitations
Vulnerable to fire, pests, and drought (risk of reversal)
Benefits can take years to fully materialise
Verification and permanence can be complex
⚡ Renewable energy
What it is
Funding solar, wind, hydro, or geothermal projects that replace fossil-fuel-based energy.
Advantages
Directly displaces high-carbon electricity
Supports energy security and local jobs
Proven and scalable technology
Limitations
Additionality can be questioned where renewables are already profitable
More about avoiding future emissions than directly removing CO₂
🏘️ Clean cooking & community projects
What it is
Efficient cookstoves, clean fuels, and energy-access solutions that reduce reliance on wood and charcoal.
Advantages
Major health and safety benefits (less indoor air pollution)
Cuts deforestation pressure and black-carbon emissions
Direct social impact for low-income households
Limitations
Verification of long-term use can be challenging
Risk of “one-size-fits-all” tech that doesn’t fit local needs
🔥 Methane capture & waste
What it is
Capturing methane from landfills, livestock, agriculture, or wastewater, and converting or destroying it.
Advantages
Methane reduction has immediate climate benefits
Often generates usable energy from captured gas
High impact per tonne of emissions avoided
Limitations
Technology and infrastructure can be costly
Strong monitoring is needed to avoid leakage over time
🚜 Soil & regenerative agriculture
What it is
Improved land and farming practices (reduced tilling, cover crops, rotational grazing) that store more carbon in soils.
Advantages
Supports food security and soil health
Benefits accumulate over time with better land stewardship
Can improve resilience to drought and erosion
Limitations
Soil-carbon measurement remains technically complex
Carbon gains can reverse if practices stop
🧪 Tech-based removals
What it is
Engineered systems that directly capture and store carbon — for example biochar, direct air capture, or carbon capture and storage.
Advantages
Can deliver durable, measurable carbon removals
Potential to scale beyond purely nature-based solutions
Useful for long-term decarbonisation pathways
Limitations
Currently high cost and early-stage deployment
May raise questions about land, water, or energy use

How much does carbon offsetting really help the environment?

note icon

Carbon offsetting sits in a tricky middle ground. On one hand, it channels money into climate projects that might otherwise struggle to get funded. On the other, a growing body of evidence shows that many credits have delivered far less climate impact than advertised.

Recent investigations into rainforest offset programmes found that many issued credits didn’t actually translate into real, measurable emissions reductions. A 2024 study in Nature Communications went further, estimating that less than 16% of the credits they assessed reflected genuine, additional emissions cuts, with big variations between project types. There's growing concern that the offset industry is guilty of over-promising on climate impact while letting companies lean on cheap credits instead of actually cutting their own emissions.

At the same time, it would be an oversimplification to say all offsets are useless. Some projects - like certain industrial gas destruction projects or well-designed forest and community initiatives - have been shown to deliver real, measurable climate benefits and important community benefits. The problem is inconsistency.

note icon

This is why there’s now such a strong push for reform rather than abandonment. The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) has introduced its Core Carbon Principles (CCPs) to define what “high-quality” should look like, and has started approving major registries against these rules, covering the vast majority of the current market.

While the Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative (VCMI) has published a Claims Code and a Scope 3 Action Code, which set guardrails for how companies can use credits, and how much, alongside deep emissions cuts, rather than instead of them.

So, how much does offsetting help? The honest answer is: it depends hugely on the quality of the credits and what else the company is doing. Used well, high-integrity offsets can direct finance to valuable climate and community projects, especially in the Global South. Used badly, they risk over-stating climate progress, delaying real emissions reductions, and in some cases even enabling harmful practices behind a “green” label.

note icon

This is why offsets should sit behind, not in front of, a robust reduction strategy. Companies need to focus first on cutting emissions at the source, then use carefully chosen, high-quality offsets to address the residual impact they can’t yet eliminate.

Close
youtube screenshot

What are the pros and cons of carbon offsets?

Carbon offsets aren’t a shortcut to sustainability, but they can play a useful supporting role when reductions have already been pushed as far as they reasonably can. At their best, they direct funding toward climate projects that need it, especially in regions where financing is limited or slow to arrive.

Some of the key benefits include:

🌱

Environmental restoration

Supports ecosystem repair and reforestation, helping store carbon and protect biodiversity.

Clean energy support

Funds renewable power where fossil fuels still dominate, expanding access to cleaner energy.

🏘️

Community impact

Improves local living conditions through clean cooking, better air quality, and fair job creation.

🔧

Energy efficiency

Backs projects that reduce energy waste, cutting emissions by simply using less.

📣

Awareness & engagement

Encourages companies to measure their footprint and make climate action part of their strategy.

🕒

A bridge while reducing

Helps manage unavoidable emissions while longer-term reductions move forward.

🧪

Innovation funding

Supports early climate tech like biochar and carbon capture that may scale in future.

🤝

Global partnerships

Connects climate finance with regions that need it most, sharing impact across borders.

We’ve already covered some of the wider issues facing the carbon market today, from inconsistent verification to questions around real-world impact, but there are also more practical drawbacks to be aware of when offsets enter a company’s strategy. These don’t make offsetting bad, they simply highlight why it can’t stand in for cutting emissions directly.

Some of the main concerns include:

🕹️

Over-reliance

Offsets can become a shortcut if companies lean on them instead of making real cuts to their own emissions.

🧮

Verification & accuracy

Not all projects deliver the reductions they claim, and measuring real impact is still uneven across the market.

Timing of benefits

Some projects, like tree planting, take decades to store meaningful carbon, while emissions are rising now.

🔥

Permanence & leakage

Stored carbon can be released again through fire, logging, or shifting activity to unprotected areas.

🏘️

Local impact questions

Some projects have clashed with community rights or prioritised carbon over local biodiversity and land needs.

📉

Market volatility

Prices, rules, and quality standards change, making long-term planning and consistent impact more difficult.

Close
youtube screenshot

When should your company consider using carbon offsets?

note icon

Offsets make the most sense once a company has already tackled what it can control: energy use, travel, procurement, and supply-chain emissions. With reduction work in motion, offsets can cover the residual impact - the part that can’t be eliminated right away - rather than replacing the need to reduce emissions at the source.

How can a company offset carbon emissions?

1

Calculate your carbon footprint
Start with a clear baseline: energy use, travel, procurement, and supply chain. Knowing where emissions come from makes reduction targets concrete — not guesswork — and progress easier to measure.

2

Reduce what you can control
Switch to cleaner energy, cut unnecessary travel, review suppliers, and improve efficiency. Even small operational changes add up quickly when they’re consistent and measured.

3

Offset the rest
Once reductions are in motion, offsets can cover what remains. Choose verified, high-integrity projects and communicate clearly about how and why you're using them.

Carbon offset FAQ:

  • Can companies use offsets instead of reducing emissions from their own operations?

    Short answer: no. Offsets shouldn’t replace real emission-cutting measures. They should complement them. High-integrity offsetting can help with the portion of emissions that’s hard to avoid, but direct reductions (energy, travel, production, supply-chain, etc.) must remain the priority.

  • Can small businesses or local organisations realistically use offsets? Or is it only for large corporations?

    Yes - smaller organisations or even local groups can use offsets, especially if they pool demand together. The key is transparency, realistic emissions measurement, and choosing carefully-verified projects. Good offset providers and registries work with organisations of various sizes.

  • How can a company know that offset credits are real and effective?

    To improve confidence, companies (and buyers) should check for credible certification or registry stamps: e.g. from well-known standards, transparent calculations, and evidence of long-term monitoring.

  • Do offset projects counted in a national emissions inventory (e.g. in the UK) still count for carbon credits?

    Not always. In some cases (especially reforestation or land-use changes in developed countries), the removal may already be included in national commitments, which makes them ineligible for offset credits.

  • Are voluntary carbon markets regulated, or are they risky because of weak oversight?

    Voluntary markets are currently less regulated than compliance (regulated) markets. That flexibility allows more innovation - but also more risk. For example, reviews of voluntary offset markets highlight issues with additionality, permanence, and consistency. Some countries (like the UK) are working on tighter standards and clearer guidance to improve integrity.

  • How is the UK tightening carbon offset standards?

    The UK is moving toward clearer rules for how companies buy and claim offsets. Government-backed frameworks like the Woodland Carbon Code and Peatland Code already set stronger verification and permanence expectations, and wider guidance is in development to improve integrity and reduce low-quality credits in the voluntary market.

Close
youtube screenshot

What about Greenly?

Unmatched Data Accuracy — Your foundation for confident climate action
We deliver the most precise & auditable carbon assessment so your GHG data is bullet-proof from ingestion to reporting.
📊 Scope 1, 2 & 3 analysis using activity-based & spend-based data
🗂️ Dynamic database of 350k+ Emission Factors (sector- & location-specific)
🤖 Automated EF matching via an evolving algorithm
🧠 AI-powered data categorisation covering over 100+ languages
🔎 Granular analytics (BU, scope-specific, corporate, division, facility…)
📄 4000+ GHG reports delivered (for 3000+ clients)
🛡️ Built-in data quality controls with automated ingestion & validation
🧾 Internal visibility & ready-to-export audit trails
🌍 Aligned with global standards (GHG Protocol, ADEME, Bilan Carbone, SBTi, etc.)
Gain Expertise & Lead Your Decarbonisation In-house
Empower your team to become autonomous climate experts with workshops, in-app training and granular insights to manage projects confidently.
🗺️ Roadmap workshops: targets & action pathways
🎓 In-app training & stakeholder buy-in incl. supplier onboarding
📚 Full climate e-learning library with employee challenges
🧩 Project & task manager tailored to your company (owners, budgets, timelines)
🤝 Scope 3 supplier portal with automated reminders & autonomous workflows (GHG assessment, LCA, etc.)
Personalised & Actionable Decarbonisation
We turn your data into an action plan with impact & financial analysis so you can prioritise the most effective and feasible levers.
📚 Action Plan Library: 200+ quantified actions (reduction potential & steps)
📈 Decarbonisation Trajectory Builder: real-time simulation, scenarios & industry benchmarking
🎯 Personalised suggestions linked to targets (corporate/division/site)
🔗 Supplier integration: modelled supplier trajectories & contribution to targets
✅ End-to-end SBTi module (from commitment letter to expert review)
Save Time & Focus on Action, Not Admin
We streamline your entire carbon workflow to cut admin burden and give you real-time visibility on progress.
🔗 100+ API integrations (ERP, accounting, logistics, cloud, HR…)
🤖 AI-powered data harmonisation (ETL)
🧾 1-click, audit-grade exports (CSRD, SEC, GHG Protocol, etc.)
📆 Annual footprint tracking & automatic EF updates
🎯 Yearly target recalibration
📊 Live dashboards & monthly progress reporting (Gantt-style monitoring)
🌱 Offset portfolio via Patch (vetted projects)
greenly platform
Sources:

Share this article

Subscribe to the CSO Connect Newsletter
We care about your data in our privacy policy.

More articles

View all
people putting hands together as a team
ESG / CSR
ESG Initiatives
1 min

What is Lean Management?

1 min
Level

In this article, we’ll explain what lean management is, the five principles, and how your company can get started with lean management.

office space
ESG / CSR
Net zero trajectory
1 min

10 Reasons to Track a Corporate Carbon Footprint

1 min
Level

In this article, we’ll explain what a corporate carbon footprint is, why it’s important, how it is measured, and reasons why your company should track it too.

Shape the present.

Build the future.

Get a demo