What are Scopes 1, 2 and 3 Emissions?
In this article, we define what Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions are and their significance in managing a company's carbon footprint.
ESG / CSR
Industries
Greenly solutions
The EU Taxonomy is a landmark framework designed to guide sustainable investments and support the European Union's ambitious climate goals under the European Green Deal. As the EU ramps up efforts to reduce GHG emissions, the Taxonomy provides a classification system for determining which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. By offering clear criteria, it helps investors and businesses align their financial activities with sustainability targets, reducing greenwashing and promoting genuine progress toward a low-carbon economy.
👉 In this article, we'll break down what the EU Taxonomy is, how it works, the criteria for sustainable activities, and its broader impact on businesses and financial markets.
The EU Taxonomy is a classification framework designed to identify and promote environmentally sustainable economic activities. It was introduced as part of the EU’s sustainable finance strategy to ensure that capital flows are directed towards projects and businesses that contribute to the EU’s climate and environmental objectives.
At its core, the EU Taxonomy provides a system to determine whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable, helping investors and companies align their financial strategies with global climate goals. The regulation is legally binding for large companies and financial market participants, making it a critical component in driving corporate transparency and accountability regarding sustainability efforts.
The EU Taxonomy was developed to:
The EU Taxonomy is structured around six key environmental objectives, designed to cover the full spectrum of sustainability challenges:
For an activity to be considered sustainable under the EU Taxonomy, it must contribute substantially to at least one of these objectives while complying with strict environmental criteria.
To determine whether an economic activity can be classified as sustainable under the EU Taxonomy, it must meet a set of four rigorous technical criteria. These criteria ensure that activities contribute meaningfully to the EU’s environmental goals while avoiding harm in other areas. The framework is designed to prevent greenwashing by providing a clear, science-based standard for sustainability.
An activity must make a substantial contribution to at least one of the six environmental objectives outlined in the EU Taxonomy. This means the activity should significantly advance climate or environmental goals, such as:
The technical screening criteria specify thresholds for each objective, ensuring that the activity provides measurable, positive environmental impact.
While contributing positively to one objective, the activity must also do no significant harm to the other five objectives. This requirement ensures that sustainability efforts in one area don’t come at the expense of other environmental priorities.
For example:
The DNSH principle ensures a holistic approach to sustainability, preventing partial or misleading claims about an activity’s environmental impact.
In addition to environmental criteria, the EU Taxonomy requires compliance with minimum social and governance safeguards. These align with international standards like the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Key requirements include:
An activity must also comply with the applicable technical screening criteria (TSC), which set science-based thresholds and performance metrics for each environmental objective. These criteria ensure activities meet measurable sustainability standards and avoid greenwashing.
For example:
The TSC are periodically updated to reflect scientific advancements, ensuring the criteria remain aligned with the EU’s sustainability goals.
These criteria ensure a high standard of sustainability that goes beyond superficial environmental claims. They help to:
The EU Taxonomy has been introduced through a phased approach, with gradual implementation to ensure businesses and financial institutions have time to adapt to the regulatory requirements. The focus has been on increasing transparency and standardizing sustainability disclosures to prevent greenwashing while directing capital toward genuinely sustainable activities.
The EU Taxonomy’s rollout has followed a structured timeline since its adoption:
The EU Taxonomy primarily applies to:
Companies subject to the EU Taxonomy must disclose how their activities align with the regulation using specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
Failure to comply with the EU Taxonomy reporting requirements can lead to:
The EU Taxonomy continues to evolve, with recent updates reflecting both the expansion of criteria and ongoing debates over the inclusion of certain energy sources. These developments aim to refine the framework while balancing scientific rigor with political and economic realities.
Initially, the EU Taxonomy focused on the first two objectives: climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation. However, as of January 2024, the Taxonomy now covers all six environmental objectives:
This expansion requires businesses to assess their activities against more comprehensive sustainability criteria, broadening the scope of the regulation and increasing the complexity of compliance.
In a controversial move, the EU officially included nuclear energy and natural gas as Taxonomy-aligned activities under specific conditions starting in 2023. These additions sparked debate due to their environmental impact and the potential for misuse of the framework for greenwashing.
Key conditions for inclusion:
While these additions aim to support Europe’s energy transition, critics argue they weaken the Taxonomy's credibility by classifying transitional fuels as sustainable.
The Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) were updated to clarify what constitutes a substantial contribution for all six objectives. Key changes include:
The EU Taxonomy's influence continues to grow, with financial institutions increasingly using it to screen investment portfolios and design green financial products. However, many companies still face challenges in interpreting the complex technical requirements, especially in sectors without fully defined screening criteria.
Looking ahead, the European Commission plans to:
While the EU Taxonomy is widely regarded as a landmark initiative for sustainable finance, its implementation has not been without challenges and criticism. Some of the key concerns relate to its complexity, political influence, and the practical difficulties faced by businesses trying to comply.
Challenge | Description |
---|---|
Complexity and Interpretation | The technical screening criteria are highly detailed and complex, making it difficult for companies—especially SMEs—to interpret and apply them consistently. This complexity often results in discrepancies in how businesses classify and report their sustainability efforts. |
Data Availability and Verification | Accurate sustainability reporting requires access to granular environmental performance data, which many companies struggle to collect. Smaller businesses often lack the resources to meet data demands, and there are limited standardized datasets available, increasing the risk of inconsistent reporting. |
Inclusion of Nuclear and Gas Energy | The inclusion of nuclear and natural gas under strict conditions has sparked significant criticism. While nuclear energy is low-carbon, concerns around radioactive waste management persist. Natural gas, although less polluting than coal, still emits substantial carbon, leading critics to argue its inclusion weakens the framework’s climate integrity. |
Greenwashing Risks | Despite its rigorous criteria, the Taxonomy still leaves room for greenwashing. Companies may claim partial alignment even when only a small portion of their activities meet the sustainability requirements. The allowance for gas as a transitional fuel has also raised concerns that high-emission industries could continue under a “green” label. |
Global Alignment and Interoperability | While the EU Taxonomy sets a global benchmark, other regions (like the UK and China) are developing their own versions with varying thresholds and metrics. This fragmentation complicates cross-border investments and makes it harder for multinational corporations to ensure consistent sustainability reporting across regions. |
The EU is considering a move towards simplifying sustainability reporting by consolidating key frameworks, including the EU Taxonomy Regulation, CSRD, and CSDDD, into a single regulation. Announced in November 2024 by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, this initiative aims to reduce administrative burdens and streamline ESG disclosures, responding to the Budapest Declaration's call for a 25% reduction in reporting requirements by mid-2025.
Further updates are expected to include refinements to the Technical Screening Criteria (TSC) for clarity and consistency, stricter conditions for nuclear and gas activities, and potential expansion into social sustainability factors like labour standards and community impact. These changes aim to balance simplicity with robust sustainability standards while ensuring alignment with global frameworks.
Greenly offers expert support to help businesses navigate sustainability challenges, including compliance with the EU Taxonomy and other regulatory frameworks. Our carbon management solutions are designed to streamline sustainability reporting and drive meaningful progress toward emissions reduction.
Our Services Include:
By partnering with Greenly, companies can gain valuable insights into their sustainability performance, reduce emissions, and make informed decisions that contribute to a greener future. Get in touch with us today.
Skadden, EU Seeks To Simplify ESG Reporting Obligations, https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2024/11/eu-seeks-to-simplify-esg-reporting-obligations