Greenlyhttps://images.prismic.io/greenly/43d30a11-8d8a-4079-b197-b988548fad45_Logo+Greenly+x3.pngGreenly, la plateforme tout-en-un dédiée à toutes les entreprises désireuses de mesurer, piloter et réduire leurs émissions de CO2.
GreenlyGreenly, la plateforme tout-en-un dédiée à toutes les entreprises désireuses de mesurer, piloter et réduire leurs émissions de CO2.
Descending4
Home
1
Blog
2
Category
3
Carbon Accounting Explained: Definition, Framework & 2026 Guide
4
Media > All articles > Carbon accounting > Carbon Accounting Explained: Definition, Framework & 2026 Guide

Carbon Accounting Explained: Definition, Framework & 2026 Guide

ESG / CSRCarbon accounting
Level
Hero Image
Stephanie Safdie

By , US Copywriter, on 09/01/2026

Updated by Agnès Potier-Murphy

Hero Image
calculator, note book, pen and roll of money
Carbon accounting definition, methodology, and step-by-step guide: learn how to measure, report, and reduce your company's emissions in 2026.
ESG / CSR
2026-09-01T00:00:00.000Z
en-us
Carbon accounting

Carbon accounting is the process of measuring, tracking, and reporting a company's greenhouse gas emissions, essentially a financial audit for your environmental impact. It matters more than ever right now: as climate disclosure rules tighten and stakeholders demand real transparency, companies are under pressure to do more than just go green. You need to know exactly where your emissions are coming from, how to measure them accurately, and, most importantly, how to bring them down.

This guide gives you a structured way to do exactly that: from building an accurate emissions inventory to using that data as the foundation for credible sustainability reporting and a realistic path to net-zero.

In this guide, we’ll break down the essentials of carbon accounting:
  • The Fundamentals: How the process actually works.

  • The Frameworks: The methodologies and standards businesses use to stay accurate.

  • The Strategy: How your company can turn raw emissions data into practical, effective climate action.

What is carbon accounting?

note icon

Carbon accounting (also called GHG accounting or climate accounting) is the standardized measurement, calculation, and reporting of an organization's greenhouse gas emissions, across direct operations (Scope 1), purchased energy (Scope 2), and the wider value chain (Scope 3), expressed in a single common unit, carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

In practical terms, carbon accounting (or GHG accounting, or climate accounting) works like bookkeeping: instead of tracking dollars and cents, you're tracking greenhouse gases, from the energy you buy to the emissions embedded in your entire value chain. The output of that work is what eventually becomes carbon reporting, the disclosures, filings, and public statements that show regulators, investors, and customers what you've measured. Accounting is the calculation; reporting is how you communicate it outward, even though the two are closely intertwined in practice.

How it works in practice

Carbon accounting isn't just guesswork; it’s a structured three-step process:

1

Data Collection

Gather activity data such as electricity bills, fuel receipts, and procurement records.

2

Calculation

Apply emissions factors to convert activity data into CO₂e.

3

Inventory

Pull results into a formal emissions inventory showing total impact.

note icon

Most organizations rely on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol - the gold standard for how emissions should be categorized. But it’s important to remember that carbon accounting isn’t a one-time project. It’s an ongoing cycle that helps you sharpen your data accuracy over time.

At its core, this process answers two vital questions: Where are our emissions coming from, and how big is our footprint? Once you have those answers, you have the foundation you need to set targets and build a real climate strategy.

Infographic about carbon accounting : definition and explanationnInfographic about carbon accounting : definition and explanationn

Why should my company care about carbon accounting?

The truth is: if you want to manage your company’s future, you have to measure its impact today.

Here are the five key benefits of carbon accounting driving this shift right now:

1. Staying Ahead of the Law

Requirements are tightening unevenly across regions, from California's SB 253 to the EU and UK's evolving frameworks. Proper accounting keeps you audit-ready regardless of which mandate lands first.

2. Attracting Investment

Carbon data is now a financial KPI. Transparent reporting builds credibility with investors, lenders, and insurers.

3. Driving Efficiency

Emissions data highlights inefficiencies. Reducing carbon often directly reduces operational costs.

4. Protecting Supply Chains

Identify exposure to climate and regulatory risks across your value chain and improve resilience.

5. Proving Your Progress

Track performance with credible data and avoid unsubstantiated sustainability claims.

How does carbon accounting work, step by step?

note icon

Carbon accounting is a structured, repeatable process that converts business activity into measurable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For companies, the objective is not just to calculate a footprint once, but to build a system that produces consistent, audit-ready data over time.

1

Define Boundaries

2

Collect Data

3

Calculate Emissions

4

Consolidate Results

5

Validate & Improve

1. Define organizational and operational boundaries

Before counting anything, you must determine what is included in your footprint. Most companies follow the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, which requires defining:

Organisational Boundaries

What it defines: Which entities are included in your carbon footprint.

  • Subsidiaries
  • Joint ventures
  • International offices

Approach:

  • Equity share (ownership)
  • Control (financial or operational)

Operational Boundaries

What it defines: Which emission sources are included.

  • Scope 1 (direct emissions)
  • Scope 2 (purchased energy)
  • Scope 3 (value chain emissions)

Focus:

  • Activities and processes
  • Energy use and operations
  • Upstream and downstream impacts
note icon

Why this matters: Poor boundary definition leads to inconsistent reporting, making it impossible to compare your progress over time.

2. Collect activity data

Once the boundaries are set, you gather activity data - the raw inputs for your calculations. Typical sources include:

Energy & Fuel
Electricity, gas, and fuel used in vehicles, buildings, and machinery.
🔗
Value Chain
Procurement data, business travel, and employee commuting.
♻️
Waste & Logistics
Waste treatment, transportation, and distribution activities.

You’ll likely deal with two types of data:

📊
Primary Data
Actual measured data such as utility bills or supplier-specific emissions data.
Higher accuracy — preferred approach
📉
Secondary Data
Estimates or industry averages used when direct data is unavailable.
Lower accuracy — fallback option

3. Apply emissions factors

To make sense of the data, activity (like liters of fuel) is converted into emissions using emission factors.

Example
kg CO₂e per kWh of electricity used

These factors come from recognized global databases and allow you to express all different greenhouse gases in a single, standard unit: carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

4. Build an emissions inventory

Next, you consolidate these calculations into a GHG inventory. This master dataset acts as your total carbon footprint. It allows you to:

📊
Full Emissions View
Aggregate emissions across the entire organization.
🔥
Hotspot Identification
Pinpoint where emissions are highest and most impactful.
📑
Audit-Ready Data
Build a reliable foundation for reporting and compliance.

5. Classify emissions by scope

To meet international standards, emissions are categorized into three Scopes:

Scope 1: Direct Emissions
Emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company.
Examples:
  • Fuel combustion in company vehicles
  • On-site manufacturing or industrial processes
  • Heating systems using fossil fuels
Scope 2: Indirect Energy Emissions
Emissions from purchased energy consumed by the company.
Examples:
  • Electricity used in offices or factories
  • Data centre energy use
  • Purchased heating, cooling, or steam
Scope 3: Value Chain Emissions
All other indirect emissions across the value chain.
Upstream:
  • Purchased goods and services
  • Business travel
  • Employee commuting
  • Waste disposal
Downstream:
  • Use of sold products
  • Product end-of-life
  • Distribution and logistics
infographic on scopes 1,2 and 3infographic on scopes 1,2 and 3

6. Choose calculation methodologies

Your choice of method depends on your data quality and goals:

Spend-Based
Uses financial data (€ spent) to estimate emissions.
Faster • Less precise
Activity-Based
Uses physical data (kWh, kg, litres) to calculate emissions.
More accurate • Data-intensive
Industry standard
Hybrid Approach
Combines spend-based and activity-based methods for balanced accuracy and efficiency.
Balanced • Scalable

7. Validate, report, and improve

The process doesn't end with a number. To stay credible, companies must:

01

Validate Data

Internal checks or third-party assurance to ensure accuracy.

02

Report Emissions

Disclose data through frameworks such as CDP or regulatory requirements.

03

Continuously Improve

  • Replace estimates with primary data
  • Increase Scope 3 coverage
  • Refine methodologies year over year

Is carbon accounting mandatory in the UK, EU, and US?

The short answer is Yes, it is, at least in a growing number of jurisdictions. However, what's actually required varies significantly by region. While the shift toward mandatory reporting is a global trend, the specific requirements depend heavily on where you operate. Understanding these regional frameworks is the first step in ensuring your carbon accounting system is fit for purpose.

🇪🇺 European Union: The New Gold Standard
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is the most significant change in years. It transforms carbon accounting from a side project into a core reporting function.
Who it hits
Large EU companies and non-EU firms with significant EU operations — as of the 2026 Omnibus simplification, this now means companies with more than 1,000 employees and over €450 million in net turnover, a considerably narrower group than the directive originally covered.
What it requires
Reporting on Scopes 1, 2, and 3, plus "double materiality" (how you impact the planet and how climate change impacts your bottom line).
The "Audit" Factor
Unlike previous rules, CSRD requires third-party assurance to prove your numbers are accurate.
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: Focus on Efficiency
The UK uses a combination of mechanisms to ensure businesses stay accountable:
SECR
Requires large companies to disclose energy use, Scopes 1 and 2, and "intensity metrics" (emissions relative to business growth).
UK ETS
A cap-and-trade system specifically for energy-intensive sectors like manufacturing and power.
UK SRS
The UK's new Sustainability Reporting Standards were finalized in February 2026. They're currently voluntary, though the FCA is consulting on making them mandatory for listed companies from 2027.
🇺🇸 United States: A Shifting Tide
In the U.S., the rules are moving in different directions at once, creating a landscape that's fragmented rather than uniformly tightening:
SEC Rules
The SEC has proposed rescinding its 2024 climate disclosure rule; it was never enforced, and a final decision isn't expected before 2027.
New York
New York's own Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, closely modeled on SB 253, would require large companies to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. It passed the state Senate in February 2026 and is advancing through the Assembly, not yet law, but a clear signal that California's approach won't stay unique for long.
California (SB 253 & SB 261)
SB 253 requires large companies to report Scope 1 and 2 emissions starting in 2026, with Scope 3 following in 2027; SB 261, covering financial risk, remains on hold pending litigation.
🌍 Global Standards: One Language for Carbon
Beyond local laws, we are seeing a "Great Convergence". Organizations like the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) are working to make sure emissions data is comparable across markets.
Goal
Make carbon data as reliable and useful for investors as a profit-and-loss statement.

What this means for your business

Regardless of where you operate, three trends are now non-negotiable:

What carbon accounting standards should businesses follow?

note icon

The core standards are the GHG Protocol for measurement, ISO 14064 for verification, CDP for disclosure, SBTi for target-setting, and ISSB/IFRS for financial integration. Carbon accounting isn't defined by a single methodology. Instead, it operates within an ecosystem of frameworks that ensure emissions data is consistent, comparable, and - above all - useful for making decisions.

For most companies, the challenge isn't choosing one framework; it’s understanding how they fit together across five key functions: calculation, verification, disclosure, strategy, and financial integration.

1. Calculation: the foundation of the system

The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol is the undisputed gold standard for measurement. It underpins nearly all corporate carbon reporting globally by defining Scopes 1, 2, and 3 and the specific rules for building a consistent emissions inventory.

The GHG Protocol is a suite of distinct standards tailored to different needs:

Corporate Standard
Used for measuring organizational-wide emissions.
Scope 3 Standard
Specifically for tackling complex value chain emissions.
Product Standard
For assessing the lifecycle emissions of individual goods.
note icon

In practice, almost every company reporting emissions today is following the GHG Protocol - either directly or via a regional framework aligned with it.

2. Verification and governance: making data audit-ready

Once you’ve calculated your numbers, you need to prove they are accurate. ISO 14064 provides the rigorous guidance needed to structure and validate your data. It focuses on:

GHG Inventories
Designing robust GHG inventories.
Methodological Consistency
Ensuring consistency and documenting every assumption.
Verification & Assurance
Supporting third-party verification, which is now critical for regulations like the CSRD where traceability and data evidence are legal requirements.

It essentially bridges the gap between your internal spreadsheets and the external assurance an auditor needs to see.

3. Disclosure: communicating to the world

After calculation and validation, you must communicate your findings. CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) has become the de facto global disclosure system. It collects environmental data and scores companies on their transparency and performance.

Disclosure via CDP is increasingly expected by:

Institutional Investors
Looking for ESG performance.
Enterprise Customers
Managing their own Scope 3 footprint.
Regulators
Using it as a benchmark for climate transparency.

4. Target-setting: turning data into strategy

Measurement alone isn't enough; stakeholders expect you to reduce emissions in line with climate science. The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) provides the framework for this.

SBTi allows companies to set reduction targets aligned with the 1.5°C global warming pathway. It is considered the benchmark for credibility because it requires:

Scope 3 Coverage
Broad Scope 3 coverage.
Absolute Reductions
Absolute emissions reductions (rather than just intensity targets that can hide total growth).
Minimal Offsets
Minimal reliance on offsets, prioritizing actual decarbonization instead.

5. Financial integration: the new investor-grade standard

A major shift in 2025 and 2026 is the movement of carbon data into financial reporting. The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), specifically through IFRS S1 and S2, is standardising this process globally, absorbing the climate-disclosure recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which formally disbanded in 2023 once its work was folded into this newer framework.

These standards aim to align sustainability disclosures with financial statements, requiring companies to disclose:

Climate Risks & Opportunities
Specific climate-related risks and opportunities.
Transition Plans
Detailed transition plans.
Financial Impact
The actual financial impact climate change has on the company’s bottom line.
How These Frameworks Layer Together
In a mature carbon accounting system, these frameworks aren't redundant — they are layers of a single process.
GHG Protocol
Defines what to measure and how to calculate it.
ISO 14064
Ensures the data is structured and verified correctly.
CDP
Enables you to disclose it to the global market.
SBTi
Defines how to reduce it over time with scientific credibility.
ISSB
Integrates it into your financial reporting and governance.

What challenges might your company face when implementing carbon accounting?

note icon

While the theory of carbon accounting is straightforward, doing it at scale is a significant undertaking. Most organizations quickly realise that the hurdle isn't just the math - it's building the systems, governance, and data pipelines required to produce reliable results year after year. In short, carbon accounting is less about sustainability and more about enterprise-wide data management.

1
The Scope 3 Blind Spot
For most businesses, 70–90% of emissions happen outside their four walls - in supplier networks, logistics, and product use.
  • Inconsistency: Suppliers often provide incomplete data or use different methodologies.
  • Limited Visibility: Tracking what happens to a product after it leaves the warehouse (downstream) is notoriously difficult.
  • Supplier Fatigue: Low response rates from vendors who aren't yet equipped for carbon reporting.
The Strategy: Most companies start with industry-average estimates and gradually replace them with actual supplier data as their relationships mature.
2
Fragmented Data Systems
Emissions data rarely lives in one place. It is usually scattered across disconnected departments:
  • Procurement data sits in ERP systems.
  • Travel data is locked in external booking platforms.
  • Energy use is managed locally by facilities teams.
  • Logistics info is held by third-party carriers.
The biggest hurdle: It isn't just finding the data - it's centralizing it into a single source that an auditor can trust.
3
The Need for Cross-Functional Coordination
A common mistake is assuming carbon accounting belongs solely to the Sustainability team. In reality, a mature system requires active participation from:
  • Finance: To align carbon data with financial reporting.
  • Procurement: To engage with the supply chain.
  • Operations & Facilities: To track energy and waste.
  • IT: To build the data pipelines.
  • Legal: To ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
The risk: Without clear internal governance and shared ownership, the process becomes impossible to scale.
4
Moving Goalposts (Evolving Expectations)
What was good enough last year likely won't pass an audit in 2026. Even as some regulatory requirements narrow or simplify, investor and customer expectations keep climbing, demanding:
  • More granular disclosures.
  • Clearer evidence for every assumption made.
  • Verified, audit-ready evidence.
The implication: Your reporting system needs to be flexible enough to adapt to new rules without needing a total overhaul every twelve months.
5
The Perfection Trap
Many organizations stall because they try to build a perfect system on day one. In practice, carbon accounting is a journey of continuous improvement:
  • Stage 1: Heavy reliance on spend-based estimates and broad averages.
  • Stage 2: Integration of supplier-specific data and actual operational readings.
  • Stage 3: Fully automated, auditable systems integrated into core business reporting.
The goal: Progress over perfection. Over time, your data quality, Scope 3 coverage, and internal governance will naturally sharpen.

Key carbon accounting concepts and terminology

Carbon accounting comes with a growing list of sustainability terms that are often used interchangeably - even though they refer to very different things. Before wrapping up, it’s worth clarifying a few of the concepts that companies most commonly confuse.

Carbon accounting vs. carbon assessment

Although closely related, carbon accounting and carbon assessment are not the same thing.

Measurement
Carbon Accounting
Carbon accounting is the process of measuring and quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Its goal is to produce a reliable emissions inventory using standardized methodologies and data.
“What are our emissions?”
Strategy
Carbon Assessment
Carbon assessment focuses on interpretation and action. It uses emissions data to identify hotspots, evaluate risks, prioritize reduction opportunities, and shape climate strategy.
“What should we do about them?”
note icon

A company can complete carbon accounting without taking meaningful action. A carbon assessment is what transforms emissions data into operational and strategic decisions. Both feed into carbon reporting, the disclosures and filings that communicate your numbers, and increasingly, the strategy behind them, to regulators, investors, and customers.

Carbon neutral vs. net zero

These two terms are frequently confused, but they represent very different levels of climate ambition.

Carbon Neutrality
Carbon neutrality typically means balancing emissions through carbon offsets. A company continues emitting greenhouse gases but compensates for them by funding external projects such as reforestation or carbon removal initiatives.
Often focuses on Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Relies heavily on offsetting
Can sometimes be achieved relatively quickly
Net Zero
Net zero requires companies to reduce emissions across their value chain as much as possible before neutralizing only a small amount of unavoidable residual emissions.
Covers Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions
Prioritizes actual decarbonization over offsets
Requires long-term operational transformation

These aren't abstract distinctions. Apple committed in 2020 to 100% carbon neutrality across its supply chain and products by 2030, built on a real reduction target plus high-quality carbon removal for what's left, mechanically closer to net-zero discipline than the offset-heavy version of "carbon neutral." Microsoft went further the same year, pledging to be carbon negative by 2030, cutting emissions by more than half across its direct operations and entire value chain, then removing the rest, with a longer-term goal of removing everything it's emitted since its 1975 founding by 2050. Neither company is there yet, and both illustrate exactly why the accounting has to come first: you can't credibly reduce, remove, or offset what you haven't accurately measured.

Carbon accounting frequently asked questions

  • Is carbon accounting mandatory?

    In many regions, yes, though the details vary and keep shifting. California's SB 253 already requires Scope 1 and 2 disclosure, with Scope 3 following in 2027, and New York is advancing a closely modeled law of its own; the EU's CSRD applies to a narrower set of large companies following its 2026 simplification; and the US SEC has proposed rescinding its own climate disclosure rule rather than expanding it. Requirements vary by company size, sector, and geographic presence, so check what applies to yours directly.

  • What data do companies need to start carbon accounting?

    Most companies begin with operational and financial data they already have access to, such as utility bills, fuel consumption, procurement records, supplier information, business travel expenses, logistics activity, and waste data. The goal at the beginning is not perfect precision, but establishing a reliable baseline that can gradually improve over time as reporting systems mature.

  • How long does carbon accounting take?

    The timeline depends largely on company size, operational complexity, and data maturity. An initial carbon footprint assessment can often be completed within a few weeks, but building a fully integrated and audit-ready carbon accounting system is typically a longer-term process that evolves over several reporting cycles as organizations improve data quality, supplier engagement, and internal governance.

  • Can small and mid-sized businesses do carbon accounting?

    Yes. While enterprise carbon accounting still faces the most regulatory pressure, and typically requires more granular data across multiple business units and subsidiaries, small and medium-sized businesses are increasingly adopting carbon accounting too, driven by customer expectations, supply chain requirements, investor pressure, and sustainability commitments. Many SMEs begin with simplified reporting approaches before gradually expanding the sophistication and accuracy of their systems as they scale.

  • What does a carbon accountant do?

    A carbon accountant measures, tracks, and reports an organization's greenhouse gas emissions, translating activity data like energy bills and travel records into a standardized emissions inventory. The role blends data analysis, regulatory knowledge, and increasingly, software fluency, as more companies bring carbon accounting in-house rather than outsourcing it entirely.

  • Do I need to hire a carbon accounting service, or can I do this in-house?

    Either can work. Carbon accounting services suit companies without internal sustainability expertise or bandwidth, offering hands-on support for complex Scope 3 calculations. Many companies instead choose software like Greenly's platform to build in-house capability, combining automation with expert guidance rather than outsourcing the whole process.

  • What’s the difference between carbon accounting software and spreadsheets?

    Spreadsheets can support early-stage carbon calculations, but they quickly become difficult to manage as reporting requirements become more complex. Carbon accounting software, or any dedicated carbon accounting solution, helps organizations centralise emissions data, automate calculations, improve traceability, support audit readiness, and manage Scope 3 emissions at scale - particularly for companies preparing for frameworks such as CSRD or investor-focused disclosures.

  • How often should companies update their carbon footprint?

    Most organizations conduct formal carbon reporting annually, but many companies are moving toward more continuous or quarterly monitoring as climate reporting expectations increase. More frequent tracking improves decision-making, helps organizations identify operational inefficiencies faster, and supports stronger disclosure and audit readiness over time.

  • How does predictive modeling fit into decarbonization strategy?

    Predictive modeling sits on the carbon assessment side of the process, using your emissions data to shape strategy rather than just measure it. Greenly's Trajectory Builder extends your accounting data directly into decarbonization strategy, running real-time simulations and benchmarking your reduction scenarios against industry peers, so you move from measurement to a defensible reduction pathway without switching platforms.

youtube screenshot

What About Greenly?

Unmatched Data Accuracy — Your foundation for confident climate action
As a complete carbon accounting solution, we deliver the most precise & auditable carbon assessment so your GHG data is bullet-proof from ingestion to reporting.
📊 Scope 1, 2 & 3 analysis using activity-based & spend-based data
🗂️ Dynamic database of 350k+ Emission Factors (sector- & location-specific)
🤖 Automated EF matching via an evolving algorithm
🧠 AI-powered data categorization covering over 100+ languages
🔎 Granular analytics (BU, scope-specific, corporate, division, facility…)
📄 4000+ GHG reports delivered (for 3000+ clients)
🛡️ Built-in data quality controls with automated ingestion & validation
🧾 Internal visibility & ready-to-export audit trails
🌍 Aligned with global standards (GHG Protocol, ADEME, Bilan Carbone, SBTi, etc.)
Gain Expertise & Lead Your Decarbonization In-house
Empower your team to become autonomous climate experts with workshops, in-app training and granular insights to manage projects confidently.
🗺️ Roadmap workshops: targets & action pathways
🎓 In-app training & stakeholder buy-in incl. supplier onboarding
📚 Full climate e-learning library with employee challenges
🧩 Project & task manager tailored to your company (owners, budgets, timelines)
🤝 Scope 3 supplier portal with automated reminders & autonomous workflows (GHG assessment, LCA, etc.)
Personalized & Actionable Decarbonization
We turn your data into an action plan with impact & financial analysis so you can prioritize the most effective and feasible levers.
📚 Action Plan Library: 200+ quantified actions (reduction potential & steps)
📈 Decarbonization Trajectory Builder: real-time simulation, scenarios & industry benchmarking
🎯 Personalized suggestions linked to targets (corporate/division/site)
🔗 Supplier integration: modelled supplier trajectories & contribution to targets
✅ End-to-end SBTi module (from commitment letter to expert review)
Save Time & Focus on Action, Not Admin
We streamline your entire carbon workflow to cut admin burden and give you real-time visibility on progress.
🔗 100+ API integrations (ERP, accounting, logistics, cloud, HR…)
🤖 AI-powered data harmonization (ETL)
🧾 1-click, audit-grade exports (CSRD, SEC, GHG Protocol, etc.)
📆 Annual footprint tracking & automatic EF updates
🎯 Yearly target recalibration
📊 Live dashboards & monthly progress reporting (Gantt-style monitoring)
🌱 Offset portfolio via Patch (vetted projects)
Greenly Video Preview
Sources

Share this article

Subscribe to the CSO Connect Newsletter
We care about your data in our privacy policy.

More articles

View all
wind turbine farm in the countryside
ESG / CSR
Net zero trajectory
1 min

Decarbonization: what it is and why it matters

1 min
Level

What is decarbonization, and why is it urgent? Learn practical steps companies can take to support the global move toward net zero emissions.

Shape the present.

Build the future.

Get a demo